We’ve all heard it—perhaps in a moment of despair, maybe as a resigned whisper:
“You can’t escape fate.”
It lingers in our minds like an ancient echo. Sometimes it offers comfort, sometimes it demands submission. But no matter the intent, the phrase takes root in us and refuses to let go.
Because beneath those five simple words lies a question that has haunted humanity for millennia:
Is fate real? And if it is, can we ever defy it?
This question is not just the concern of religion or myth. It is a deeply philosophical inquiry—one that asks not only about the nature of the future but about where we stand within it. To ask about fate is to ask about the limits of our freedom,the structure of the universe, and ultimately, the depths of our own identity.
Let us venture into this question together, traveling from ancient philosophy to timeless mythology, and finally into the tragic depths of one of the most powerful stories ever told: Oedipus Rex by Sophocles.
Fate and Freedom: A Tension at the Core of Human Thought
Since the time of the ancient Greeks, philosophers have wrestled with a central paradox:
To what extent are we free?
Do we have agency, or are we merely playing roles written long before we were born?
This tension between destiny and autonomy is not just theoretical. It speaks to how we understand guilt, responsibility, identity, and even love. Our sense of morality is bound up in the belief that we are the authors of our choices. But what if those choices were never truly ours?
The Stoics: Harmony Through Acceptance
The Stoics, like Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius, believed the cosmos was governed by a rational divine order called logos. According to them, every event happens as it must, according to a grand design.
Fate, in this view, is unchangeable. But that doesn’t mean humans are powerless. Our freedom lies in our response. When we suffer, when we are disappointed or wounded, the wise do not resist reality—they align themselves with it. Virtue, then, is not control over outcomes, but mastery over one’s reaction. It is freedom within necessity.
The Epicureans: Chance as Liberation
In stark contrast, Epicurus and his followers emphasized chance and randomness. They believed atoms swerved unpredictably—a concept they called the clinamen—creating the space for genuine freedom. In a universe not bound entirely by causality, humans can carve out decisions that are their own.
This line of thinking blooms fully in Jean-Paul Sartre, who declared:
“Existence precedes essence.”
We are not born with a fixed nature. Instead, we define ourselves through choices. And with those choices comes the heavy burden of responsibility. In Sartre’s universe, fate doesn’t exist—only freedom and its often crushing weight.
But Who’s Really Choosing?
Just when we think we’ve reached clarity, a shadow falls over the idea of freedom.
What if our decisions are not as autonomous as we believe?
What if the forces shaping our choices are not external, but hidden within us?
This question leads us into the territory of determinism—the view that everything, including our thoughts, desires, and actions, arises from a chain of prior causes. Even if we feel free, our path may have been laid by childhood conditioning, cultural expectations, or unconscious fears.

In such a view, freedom becomes less about external constraints and more about internal awareness. The Stoics would nod in agreement: true wisdom isn’t found in controlling events, but in recognizing what is within our power—and what is not.
Still, this tension—between fate and freedom, between illusion and awareness—is perhaps best explored not through theory, but through story.
Prophecy as Destiny: The Myth of Oedipus
In mythology, fate is often embodied by gods, curses, or oracles. But these stories are never just about divine punishment or supernatural rules.
They are about the human psyche—about how fear, denial, and self-ignorance pull us into the very things we dread.
The tragedy of Oedipus begins, like many myths, with a prophecy. King Laius and Queen Jocasta of Thebes consult the oracle about their newborn son. The message is terrifying:
This child will one day kill his father and marry his mother.
In panic, they attempt to avert the future by ordering the child’s death. His ankles are pierced and he is abandoned on a mountainside.
But fate, it seems, finds detours.
A shepherd rescues the child and brings him to King Polybus of Corinth. The boy, named Oedipus—“swollen foot”—grows up unaware of his origins.
Yet destiny lingers like smoke. As he matures, rumors of his illegitimacy reach him. When he consults the oracle, he hears the same prophecy his birth parents heard:
You will kill your father and marry your mother.
Horrified, Oedipus flees Corinth to avoid harming those he believes to be his parents.
But in fleeing, he unknowingly walks the road of prophecy.
The Road That Leads Inward
On his journey, he quarrels with and kills a man on a desolate path. That man is Laius—his biological father. Unaware of the truth, Oedipus continues to Thebes, which is under siege by a monstrous Sphinx.
The Sphinx challenges travelers with a riddle:
What walks on four legs in the morning, two at noon, and three in the evening?
Oedipus answers confidently:
Man.
He is correct. The Sphinx destroys herself. Thebes is saved. Oedipus is hailed a hero.
As a reward, he is offered the hand of the widowed queen—Jocasta. He accepts.
Thus, the prophecy completes its second half. Oedipus, unknowingly, has married his mother and become the father of his half-siblings.
But fate is not yet done.
The Truth Will Not Rest
Years pass. Thebes is again in crisis—plagued by sickness and death. The citizens plead for deliverance. Oedipus, determined to find the cause, turns once more to the oracle.
This time, the message is stark:
The curse upon Thebes lies in the unsolved murder of King Laius.
Obsessed with justice, Oedipus launches an investigation. But each clue leads him closer—not to a stranger, but to himself.
What unfolds is a slow, horrifying unraveling.
The killer is not out there.
The pollution is within.
Jocasta realizes the truth before he does. She hangs herself. When Oedipus finally understands, he blinds himself with her golden brooches.
To See Without Eyes
Blinded, Oedipus steps into the role of the seer—the one who truly sees.
Because blindness here is not merely punishment—it is revelation.
Stripped of external vision, Oedipus is forced to look inward. And only in that darkness does true understanding begin.

This is the power of Sophocles’ masterpiece: it reveals that fate is not just an outside force, but an internal pattern, shaped by fear, ignorance, and our relentless refusal to face the truth.
We flee what we fear—but often run directly into it.
Fate, then, is not written in the stars. It’s written in our avoidance, our blind spots, our refusal to confront the self.
And so, most of the time, what we run from is not destiny itself—
But the version of ourselves that destiny reflects back at us.
Leave a Comment